Accountability in Action: Navigating Federal Performance Management Changes 

Federal agencies are facing a pivotal shift. Recent executive orders and guidance from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) are reshaping performance management across the government, calling for greater accountability, clearer expectations, and stronger alignment with mission outcomes. These changes are influencing how agencies operate and lead and, more broadly, performance culture. 

Here are the key directives driving this transformation: 

  • Restoring Accountability for Career Senior Executives (Jan 20, 2025): A presidential memo directing agencies to reclassify roles, restructure oversight boards, and introduce stricter appraisal systems for the Senior Executive Service (SES) that better align leadership performance with administration priorities. 
  • Performance Management for Federal Employees (June 17, 2025): An OPM memo standardizing the appraisal cycle for non-SES employees, introducing a supervisory accountability element, and requiring regular progress reviews to enforce clearer performance distinctions and reward true high performers. 

Together, they signal a move toward a high-performance, high-accountability federal workforce. 

For the Senior Executive Service (SES):
• Career-reserved positions are being reclassified to general SES roles, increasing flexibility in leadership staffing.
• Executive Resource Boards (ERBs) and Performance Review Boards (PRBs) are being restructured to reflect administration priorities.
• New performance plans emphasize quarterly reviews, forced rating distributions, and limited awards.
For the General Workforce (GWF):
• A standardized fiscal-year appraisal cycle begins October 1, 2026.
• Supervisors must conduct at least three formal progress reviews annually.
• A new supervisory critical element, Holding Employees Accountable, will be rated.
• Awards will be tied strictly to ratings above “Fully Successful,” reinforcing a merit-based culture.

These updates aim to end inflated ratings, clarify performance expectations, and ensure that only high performers receive recognition or advancement. 

For SES leaders, updated evaluation criteria and oversight structures may lead to a reassessment of expectations and leadership approaches. Agencies are also exploring ways to enhance performance tracking and data integration to support new standards. 

For the general workforce, clearer expectations and more frequent feedback are encouraging a shift toward more structured and proactive performance management. Supervisors are adjusting to new requirements, including shorter timelines for performance improvement plans and recurring training obligations.  

Successful implementation of these changes requires more than awareness; it demands strategy, tools, and tailored support. We’ve developed a set of targeted strategies to help agencies navigate these performance management changes, which include:

  • Experiential learning programs that prepare supervisors to lead in a high-accountability environment. 
  • Performance management guides, job aids, and AI-enhanced templates that simplify compliance and improve evaluation quality. 
  • Facilitated implementation efforts, including strategic communications and visioning sessions (i.e., meetings for leadership and key players to collaborate on a shared vision of the future state) that build buy-in and align reforms with agency culture. 
  • Leveraging existing tools, like USA Performance, to support quarterly reviews, monitor rating distributions, and strengthen narrative alignment. 

Thoughtful implementation can turn policy mandates into mission-driven improvements. Our approach blends policy fluency, human-centered design, and technical expertise to ensure agencies meet requirements and build lasting capability. 

Performance management reform is a chance for agencies to rethink how they manage talent, drive performance, and deliver on their mission. By normalizing rating distributions, aligning awards with performance, and equipping supervisors with the right tools, agencies can foster a culture of high-performance, accountability, and transparency. 


Meg Duffy

Meg Duffy is a Senior Consultant who has experience with training development and facilitation, managing and supporting employees, and program management and development. Meg is a member of FMP’s Learning and Development Community of Practice (CoP) and the Project Management Community of Practice (CoP). For fun, she likes to bake, run, travel, and try out all the great restaurants in the DMV. 

Sarah Tucker

Sarah Tucker is a Senior Consultant at FMP LLC, helping organizations diagnose and solve work-related challenges. She earned an M.A. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Middle Tennessee State University. Sarah has worked with organizations to improve their effectiveness in multiple capacities for five + years. She is passionate about improving work-life and making a lasting impact on the human capital environment.